Categorized | News

Hoffmann: Budget tap dance

Special to Hawaii 24/7 by Kohala Councilman Pete Hoffmann

The most recent phase of the County’s annual budget skirmish concluded May 18 with some interesting outcomes. Regardless how one views the Council actions this year, I feel we’ve done a little better than our normal “rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic” routine.

Hours of discussion and testimony did recommend some amendments to the Mayor’s second budget, although I’m not certain the Council did enough to warrant unanimous applause.

Council members have criticized the Mayor’s budget submissions this year as deferring expenses rather than saving anything. I agree.

The Mayor deferred some $29 million in expenses to other budget cycles. If those deferments were added to his proposed budget of $367 million, that would mean the budget would total approximately $396 million. Not much of a ‘savings’ in my opinion, in fact somewhat higher than our current fiscal year budget of $374 million.

But I don’t disagree with all of the Mayor’s proposed deferments, particularly those associated with debt service payments and the payroll delay. Those are reasonable one-time deferments and are common budget mechanisms employed by almost all other government entities.

The complete elimination of the GASB45 payment is another issue, however. As indicated previously, I called for at least a partial use of the GASB45 expense as a ‘bill-payer’ in prior-year budget skirmishes. I was sharply criticized, told it would cost the County in penalties, that it violated some rules, and otherwise I was dismissed completely.

This year, GASB45 becomes the Mayor’s ‘salvation’ and source of the largest deferment that balances his budget. What a difference a year makes!!

The Council in its deliberations focused on the GASB45 elimination. I maintain a partial deferment is OK, but not the entire amount. Toward that end, the Council amended the budget to take $2.7 million from the Budget Stabilization Fund, approximately $1million from the Open Space Fund, $200,000 from overtime accounts, and $5.6 million from OCE accounts, the latter amount being referred back to the administration to determine where those cuts would be made.

In addition, $500,000 from the West Hawaii Golf program could also be used as an offset to the GASB45 deferment. In total, the Council decided that the $29 million deferment proposed by the Mayor be divided into thirds: we left approximately one-third or $9 million alone (the payroll delay and the debt service payment).

We added back approximately one-third or $10 million to the GASB45 account. And we agreed to defer one-third or $10 million of the GASB payment.

Are we happy? Maybe not, but as I mentioned previously, we did a little better than rearrange deck chairs, even though we did kick a sizeable ‘can’ down the road a little. I’ll admit I wasn’t overly excited about referring $5.6 milion back to the Mayor, requesting that he tell us where the cuts be made. I would have been more pleased if the Council determined the location of these decreases.

But in previous budget discussions we did suggest some compromise on a variety of budget issues (Hamakua land sale, GASB45 last year, hiring freeze, and a more aggressive elimination of most vacant funded positions, to name a few), none of which met with favorable consideration.

Whether or not we can consider this ‘throwback’ normal budget procedure is arguable, but there seemed to be little recourse to insure that some reduction in the $29 million deferred expenses is made.

And exactly what is the result of this “budget tap dance?” Since no one chose to address the “800 pound gorilla” in the room (personnel costs), the $10 million in Council amendments adds up to a little less than a 3 percent adjustment to the Mayor’s budget (which totals $367 million).

Unless some significant change occurs at the next Council meeting June 1, we amended a few items and agreed to most of the administration proposals.

The question now: if the budget passes second reading June 1, will the Mayor accept the less than 3 percent in changes made by the Council or will the deck chairs be returned to their original positions?

Pete Hoffmann

Leave a Reply

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

RSS Weather Alerts

  • An error has occurred, which probably means the feed is down. Try again later.

 

Quantcast